Corporate Role of the ‘United States’ Government, Not What You Think!

Practical Conflict and Interests

Whether for better or for worse, the real politics of The ‘United States’ Government is (almost) as were meant to be as The United States of America-Constitution intended.  The political opened and closed doors were preset long ago and, the worse may be imminent

Seemingly, it started with the struggle between England and America, controversy raised from different motives, and various designs; all ineffectual, and the period of debate was closed. Arms, as the last resource, decided the contest; the appeal was the choice of the king, and the continent hath accepted the challenge, [1] ruled the day.

In 1871, a legislated act of Congress designated the boundaries of the District of Columbia as[2] The United States.  In essence, the law established a government business entity which, in effect, may have abolished the ‘original canonical’ Constitution of the United States of America (compare Black’s law dictionary before 2000).  The original Constitution of the United States of America (the Republic) created sovereigns for free citizens who were deemed the highest authority.  The law provided:

LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES Passed at [the] Third Session of [the] Forty-First Congress … An act to provide a government for the District of Columbia …hgfbvxc [3] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of The United States of America in Congress …[4] the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation[5] not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and[6] provisions of this act …[7]

Encyclopedia Britannica – “Municipality (local government) municipality local government in the United States, urban unit of local government. A municipality is a political subdivision of the state within which a municipal corporation has[8] been established…”[9]

One may only muse at the idea of occupation or under siege of, The United States of America (the country), by an entity named after it.  “The United States Government” (the corporation).  Separation from Great-Britain left behind many nobles who apparently infiltrated the government of the new world.

A new era for politics is struck; a new method of thinking hath arisen …[10] Whatever was advanced by the advocates on either side of the question then, terminated in one and the same point … A union with Great-Britain: the only difference between the parties was the method of effecting it; the one proposing force, the other friendship; but it hath so far happened that the first hath failed, and the second hath withdrawn her influence.[11]

By a subsequent act, on June 11, 1878, appointment of [Congressional] commissioners provided for, to have and to exercise similar powers given to the commissioners appointed under the act of 1874.[12]  The commission was congress which described itself as “The United States Government.”  The United States of America remain separate and unchanged. Thus, The United States Government was set to rule as a political business entity over The United States of America.

American Heritage Dictionary provide government, “[T]he act or process of governing, especially the control and administration of public policy in a political unit.   The office, function, or authority of a governing individual or body, exercise of authority in a political unit; rule.”[13]

Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines Corporation as “…  [an] organization of persons and material resources, chartered by the state, for the purpose of conducting business …  the practice of proxy voting by management … “[14]

The players, it seemed, were “anti-federalist’s” suspicion that the Constitution allocated too much power to the national government and legislative bodies while decreasing the role of local communities.  These were probably ‘Conservatives’ of the “Republic-Democratic”, now Conservatives and Liberals—Republican and Democratic Parties, respectively.

“If we will suffer ourselves to examine the component parts of the English constitution, we shall find them to be the base remains of two ancient tyrannies, compounded with some new republican materials: … The remains of aristocratically tyranny in the persons of the peers … wherefore in a CONSTITUTIONAL SENSE they contribute nothing towards the freedom of the state…”[15]

The new Republican Party was born in 1854 at a meeting in Ripon, Wisconsin. Abolitionists and those opposed to the extension of slavery gathered to protest the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which opened territory to slavery that had been forbidden by the old Missouri Compromise of 1820.[16]

In November 1863, President Abraham Lincoln delivered ceremonial remarks [now] known as the Gettysburg Address on the site of the Civil War’s bloodiest battle.  The Gettysburg Address was meant to declare actualization, and reinforce the Declaration of Independence which was (then) based on modern democracy[17], and has—for the most part—withstood the test of time.  Although, what has not withstood the test of time is the last passage in the speech that provide “of the people, by the people and for the people.”

Government for the people, by the people and of the people is the ultimate of myths and may very be the cause of a confused, and cynical American public.  The people are not really aware, they just belief something is seemingly wrong and working to their disadvantage. Congress passed legislation (among others) promising “consistency with the Constitution,” then, adopted law that conflict with the intention(s) of the Constitution.  All of which occurred at the “Third Session of the Forty-First Congress.”

Gitelson et al. (American Government) define politics as “activities aimed at influencing or controlling government[18] for the purpose of formulating or guiding public policy.”[19]

Suspicion of government activism distinguishes conservatism from radical forms of political thought but also from[20] liberalism, which is a modernizing anti-traditionalist movement dedicated to correcting the evils and abuses resulting from the misuse of social and political power.[21]

Neo-Conservatives may be the greatest threat to life, liberty and property this country has ever known.[22]

…   United States of America … that … territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be,[23] …created in a Government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded … exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of the Act.[24]

Conservatism’s political doctrine emphasizes the value of traditional institutions and practices.

Conservatism is a preference for the historically inherited rather than the abstract and ideal. This choice has traditionally rested on an organic conception of society—that is, on the belief that society is not merely a loose collection of individuals, but a living organism comprising closely connected, interdependent members. Conservatives thus favor institutions and practices that have evolved gradually … manifestations of continuity and stability. Government’s responsibility is to be a servant, not the master, of existing ways of life, and politicians must, therefore, resist the temptation to transform society and politics.[25]

Conservatism has often been associated with traditional and established forms of religion. After 1789, the appeal of religion redoubled, in part because of a craving for security in an age of chaos. The Roman Catholic Church, because of its roots in the middle Ages, has appealed to more conservatives than has any other religion. Although he was not a Catholic, Burke praised Catholicism as “the most effectual barrier” against radicalism. But conservatism has had no dearth of Protestant, [26] Jewish, Islamic, and strongly anticlerical adherents.[27]

Although conservatives sometimes claim philosophers as ancient as Aristotle and Cicero as their forebears, the first explicitly conservative political theorist is generally considered to be Edmund Burke. In 1790 … [Burke reasoned] to be human is to inherit a culture, and politics cannot be understood outside that culture. In contrast to the Enlightenment philosophers Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, each of whom conceived of political society as based on a hypothetical social contract among the living …

Burke shocked his contemporaries by insisting with brutal frankness that “illusions” and “prejudices” are socially necessary. He believed that most human beings are innately depraved, steeped in original sin, and unable to better themselves with their feeble reason. Better, he said, to rely on the “latent knowledge” of prejudice, which accumulates slowly through the years, than to “put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason.” Among such prejudices are those that favors an established church and a landed aristocracy; members of the latter, according to Burke, are the “great oaks” and “proper chieftains” of society, provided that they temper their rule with a spirit of timely reform and remain within the constitutional framework.[28]

In Burke’s writings the entire political sense of Europe is formulated in a new idiom, designed to bring out the folly of French revolutionaries intoxicated by sudden power and abstract ideas of a perfect society. For Burke, modern states are so complex that any attempt to reform them on the basis of metaphysical doctrines alone[29] is bound to end in despotism. The passion and eloquence with which he developed this argument contributed significantly to the powerful conservative reactions against the French Revolution throughout Europe in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.

Conservatism is defined as:

1) One who espouses a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions and preferring gradual development to an abrupt change?

2) One who believes in less government being better government?

3) One who believes in such “outmoded” ideas as civil liberties (freedom of speech, separation of church and state, right to keep and bear arms, that kind of thing?)

4) one for whom the Republican Party no longer actually speaks.

5) A word that today’s so-called “conservatives” don’t know the definition of.

“Today’s so-called ‘conservatives’ don’t even know what the word means. They think I’ve turned liberal because I believe a woman has a right to an abortion. That’s a decision that’s up to the pregnant woman, not up to the pope or some do-gooders or the Religious Right. It’s not a conservative issue at all.” — Barry Goldwater is turning over in his grave.[30]

Unavoidable Tension

The United States is a corporation.[31]  So what!

Government efforts to rein in order and equality for all citizens through “for the greater good” ideology does not consider real human disparities against imperfect legislation.  Functions of Governmental Institutions do not serve everyone equally.  Elected leaders, divided and partial to the will of their constituency are self-serving and impossible to control.  The people shall Have what the People want, accept what they cannot have and denial of what they want.

What is Obvious Makes No Sense?

One of the many driving forces behind the Constitutional Convention was to remove and/or limit unfair political influence of the rich.  Colonies of the new world knew all too well the oppression they suffered at the hands of the rich.  Today, the constant widening of the inequality gap is felt by both the privileged and unprivileged class in America.  Equal legislative representation of the people.[32]

[O]n April 30, 2014, The United States Supreme Court—in landmark decision, made for sale (to the affluent) of American elections possible by providing:

The right to participate in democracy through political contributions [that] is protected by the First Amendment … it may not … regulate contributions [just] to reduce the amount of money in politics, or to restrict the political participation of some in order to enhance the relative influence of others. Politics in government is an essential part of getting work done, it is the driving force behind legislation. [33]

Immediate necessity makes many things convenient, which if continued would grow into oppressions. Expedience and right are different things. When the calamities of America required a consultation, there was no method so so proper, as to appoint persons from the several Houses of Assembly for that purpose.  And the wisdom with which they have proceeded hath preserved this continent from ruin. But as it is more than probable that we shall never be without a CONGRESS, every well-wisher to good order, must own, that the mode for choosing members of that body, deserves consideration. And I put it as a question to those, who make a study of mankind, whether representation and election are not too great a power for one and the same body of men to possess? When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember, that virtue is not hereditary.[34]

In short, Independence is the only BOND that can tie and keep us together. We shall then see our object, and our ears will be legally shut against the schemes of an intriguing, as well, as a cruel enemy.

The “United States” et al. is a corporation, originally incorporated February 21, 1871 under the name “District of Columbia,” a de facto government, formerly the ten square mile tract ceded by Maryland and Virginia and comprising Washington D. C, plus the possessions, territories, forts, and arsenals.

The significance of this is that, as a corporation, the United States has no more authority to implement its laws against “We The People” than does Mac Donald Corporations.  Except for one thing — the contracts, we’ve signed as surety for our strawman with the United States and the Creditor Bankers. These contracts binding us with the United States and the bankers are not with us, but with our artificial entity, which appears to be us but spelled with ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. All this was done under, VICE-ADMIRALTY COURTS.[35]

The American people, however, had sovereign standing in law, independent to any connection to the states or the Crown. This fact necessitated that the people be brought back, one at a time, under British Rule, and the commercial process was the method of choice in order to accomplish this task. First, through the 14th Amendment and then through the registration of our birth certificate and property. All courts in America are Vice-admiralty courts in the Crown’s private commerce.

Works Cited

17, 2014 January, Verdate Nov 24 2008, 2014 04:40 Jan 17, and Jkt 000000. SIKES ACT (n.d.): n. pag. SIKES ACT. 26 Dec. 2013. Web. 5 Nov. 2014. <http://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Sikes%20Act.pdf&gt;.

“The American Pie of the Thirty-seventh Congress.” The American Pie of the Thirty-seventh Congress. LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 July 1862. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.frankkryder.com/pie.htm&gt;.

Author. “Neocon.” Urban Dictionary. Urban Dictionary, 30 June 2006. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Neocon&gt;.

Ball, Terence. “Conservatism (political Philosophy).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/133435/conservatism&gt;.

Common Sense. Union, NJ.: n.p., n.d. Web.

Conservatism. ACADEMIC, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http%3A%2F%2Funiversalium.academic.ru%2F96256%2Fconservatism>.

“Conservative.” Urban Dictionary. Urban Dictorary, 12 Aug. 2003. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=conservative&gt;.

“Corporation.” Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corporation&gt;.

“District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto Formed 1.” YouTube. Rerepublicusagold, 7 May 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPkauG6qE8k&gt;.

“District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 17 Aug. 2014. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Organic_Act_of_1871&gt;.

Fo, Lan Curriculum. “The Influence of “Common Sense” on the Revolutionary War.” The Influence of “Common Sense” on the Revolutionary (n.d.): n. pag. Discovery Education, 2005. Web. 5 Nov. 2014. <http://streaming.discoveryeducation.com/teacherCenter/lessonPlans/pdfs/6-8_SocialStudies_TheInfluenceOfCommonSenseOnTheRevolutionaryWar.pdf&gt;.

“GOP Convention of 1856 in Philadelphia.” Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.ushistory.org/gop/convention_1856.htm&gt;.

Griffin, G. Edward. “Freedom Force International – Welcome.” Freedom Force International – Welcome. Freedom Force International, 17 Dec. 2007. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=US_corporation&gt;.

Griffin, G. Edward. “Freedom Force International – Welcome.” IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT A CORPORATION? IF TRUE, SO WHAT? Freedom Force International, 17 Dec. 2007. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=US_corporation&gt;.

“The Hardcore News: 12/2/12 – 12/9/12.” The United States Is a Corporation. The Hardcore News, 6 Dec. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://szaboservices.blogspot.co.il/2012_12_02_archive.html&gt;.

Kilgore, Ed. “City Boundaries and Political Generalizations.” The Washington Monthly. Washington Monthly, 11 Aug. 2014. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_08/city_boundaries_and_political051610.php&gt;.

Liu, Michellee. “19th Century Conservatism by Michellee_Liu.” 19th Century Conservatism. Study Mode, 13 Dec. 2013. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/19Th-Century-Conservatism-45757143.html&gt;.

Mooney, Ryan. “Herb Levine to Take Consultant Role for Peabody Schools.” Boston.com. The New York Times, 30 Aug. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news/peabody/2012/08/herb_levine_to_take_consultant.html&gt;.

“Municipality (administrative District).” – Memidex Dictionary/thesaurus. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.memidex.com/municipality+administrative-district&gt;.

“Municipality (administrative District).” – Memidex Dictionary/thesaurus. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.memidex.com/municipality+administrative-district&gt;.

Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Union, NJ.: n.p., n.d. Web. 5 May 2014. <http://www.studenthandouts.com/Texts/New_Folder/Thomas-Paine-Common-Sense.pdf&gt;.

Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Union, NJ.: n.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.studenthandouts.com/Texts/New_Folder/Thomas-Paine-Common-Sense.pdf&gt;.

Tobin, Christina. “The Right to Participate in Democracy through Political Contributions.” US Daily Review, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http%3A%2F%2Fusdailyreview.com%2Fthe-right-to-participate-in-democracy-through-political-contributions%2F>.

“What Is Government?” Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo!, 2008. Web. 03 Nov. 2014. <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060706070858AAq2scB&gt;.

“What Is Government?” Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo!, 2008. Web. 03 Nov. 2014. <https://answers.yahoo.com/quest

[1] Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Union, NJ.: N.P., n.d. Web. <http://www.studenthandouts.com/Texts/New_Folder/Thomas-Paine-Common-Sense.pdf&gt;.

[2] Kilgore, Ed. “City Boundaries and Political Generalizations.” The Washington Monthly. Washington Monthly, 11 Aug. 2014. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_08/city_boundaries_and_political051610.php&gt;.

[3] “District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 17 Aug. 2014. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Organic_Act_of_1871&gt;

[4] 17, 2014 Anuary, Verdate Nov 24 2008, 2014 04:40 Jan 17, and Jkt 000000. SIKES ACT (n.d.): n. pag. SIKES ACT. 26 Dec. 2013. Web. 5 Nov. 2014. <http://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Sikes%20Act.pdf&gt;.

[5] “District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto Formed 1.” YouTube. Rerepublicusagold, 7 May 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPkauG6qE8k&gt;.

[6] Griffin, G. Edward. “Freedom Force International – Welcome.” IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT A CORPORATION? IF TRUE, SO WHAT? Freedom Force International, 17 Dec. 2007. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=US_corporation&gt;.

[7] “The American Pie of the Thirty-seventh Congress.” The American Pie of the Thirty-seventh Congress. LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, 1 July 1862. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.frankkryder.com/pie.htm&gt;.

[8] “Municipality (administrative District).” – Memidex Dictionary/thesaurus. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.memidex.com/municipality+administrative-district&gt;.

[9] “Municipality (administrative District).” – Memidex Dictionary/thesaurus. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.memidex.com/municipality+administrative-district&gt;.

[10] Fo, Lan Curriculum. “The Influence of “Common Sense” on the Revolutionary War.” The Influence of “Common Sense” on the Revolutionary (n.d.): n. pag. Discovery Education, 2005. Web. 5 Nov. 2014. <http://streaming.discoveryeducation.com/teacherCenter/lessonPlans/pdfs/6-8_SocialStudies_TheInfluenceOfCommonSenseOnTheRevolutionaryWar.pdf&gt;.

[11] Fo, Lan Curriculum. “The Influence of “Common Sense” on the Revolutionary War.” The Influence of “Common Sense” on the Revolutionary (n.d.): n. pag. Discovery Education, 2005. Web. 5 Nov. 2014. <http://streaming.discoveryeducation.com/teacherCenter/lessonPlans/pdfs/6-8_SocialStudies_TheInfluenceOfCommonSenseOnTheRevolutionaryWar.pdf&gt;.

[12] Griffin, G. Edward. “Freedom Force International – Welcome.” IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT A CORPORATION? IF TRUE, SO WHAT? Freedom Force International, 17 Dec. 2007. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=US_corporation&gt;.

[13] “What Is Government?” Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo!, 2008. Web. 03 Nov. 2014. <https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060706070858AAq2scB&gt;.

[14] “Corporation.” Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corporation&gt;.

[15] Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Union, NJ.: n.p., n.d. Web. 5 May 2014. <http://www.studenthandouts.com/Texts/New_Folder/Thomas-Paine-Common-Sense.pdf&gt;.

[16] “GOP Convention of 1856 in Philadelphia.” Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.ushistory.org/gop/convention_1856.htm&gt;.

[17] “The Gettysburg Address.” History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 27 Oct. 2014. <http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/gettysburg-address&gt;.

[18] “AP US GOPO.” Flashcards. N.P., n.d. Web. 03 Nov. 2014. <http://quizlet.com/6082235/ap-us-gopo-flash-cards/&gt;.

[19] Gitelson, Dudley, Dubnick, American Government (Wadsworth, Cengage Learning,                           2012) 4.

[20] Ball, Terence. “Conservatism (political Philosophy).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/133435/conservatism&gt;.

[21] Ball, Terence. “Conservatism (political Philosophy).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/133435/conservatism&gt;.

[22] Author. “Neocon.” Urban Dictionary. Urban Dictorary, 30 June 2006. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Neocon&gt;.

[23] “Freedom Force International – Welcome.” Freedom Force International – Welcome. N.P., n.d. Web. 03 Nov. 2014. <http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=US_corporation&gt;.

[24]   Griffin, G. Edward. “Freedom Force International – Welcome.” IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT A CORPORATION? IF TRUE, SO WHAT? Freedom Force International, 17 Dec. 2007. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=US_corporation&gt;.

[25] Dagger, Richard. “Conservatism (political Philosophy).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 02 Nov. 2014.

[26] Ball, Terence. “Conservatism (political Philosophy).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/133435/conservatism&gt;.

[27] Ball, Terence. “Conservatism (political Philosophy).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/133435/conservatism&gt;.

[28] Liu, Michellee. “19th Century Conservatism by Michellee_Liu.” 19th Century Conservatism. Study Mode, 13 Dec. 2013. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/19Th-Century-Conservatism-45757143.html&gt;.

[29] Conservatism. ACADEMIC, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http%3A%2F%2Funiversalium.academic.ru%2F96256%2Fconservatism>.

[30] “Conservative.” Urban Dictionary. Urban Dictorary, 12 Aug. 2003. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=conservative&gt;.

[31] “United States Is a Corporation.” United States Is a Corporation. N.P., n.d. Web. 25 Oct. 2014.

[32] Mooney, Ryan. “Herb Levine to Take Consultant Role for Peabody Schools.” Boston.com. The New York Times, 30 Aug. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news/peabody/2012/08/herb_levine_to_take_consultant.html&gt;.

[33] Tobin, Christina. “The Right to Participate in Democracy through Political Contributions.” US Daily Review, n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http%3A%2F%2Fusdailyreview.com%2Fthe-right-to-participate-in-democracy-through-political-contributions%2F>.

[34] Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Union, NJ.: n.p., n.d. Web. 5 May 2014. <http://www.studenthandouts.com/Texts/New_Folder/Thomas-Paine-Common-Sense.pdf&gt;.

[35] “The Hardcore News: 12/2/12 – 12/9/12.” The United States Is a Corporation. The Hardcore News, 6 Dec. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2014. <http://szaboservices.blogspot.co.il/2012_12_02_archive.html&gt;.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s